Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] longevity of oxide cathode tube

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] longevity of oxide cathode tube
From: sm0aom at telia.com (Karl-Arne Markström)
Date: Thu Jun 26 08:14:17 2003
If I remember correctly, this was the normal procedure for
some cavity magnetrons, as soon as RF pulses were detected at the output
a relay turned off the filament current.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "2" <2@dock.net>
To: "Karl-Arne Markstr?m" <sm0aom@telia.com>; "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>; 
"John T. M. Lyles" <jtml@lanl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] longevity of oxide cathode tube


> 
> 
> >Interesting, 
> >this description fits in on the 4CX350AC, which is marketed by Svetlana 
> >and others
> >as a lower temperature cathode and consequently longer life version of the 
> >4CX350A.
> >
> >I have encountered the 4CX250BC version of the 4CX250B, which should have 
> >similar
> >cathode properties. As far as I recall, the 4CX250BC was tried as one 
> >possible cure for the
> >tube life problems in the SRT ST1610 transmitters, but only with moderate 
> >success.
> >
> >The 4CX350AC was considered for our Collins 208U-10's, but the solid-state 
> >driver chain
> >modifications were done instead.
> >
> >It appears that tube manufacturer application engineers caution you 
> >against running oxide cathodes both undervoltage
> >and overvoltage, overvoltage seems also to speed up the malignant type of 
> >grid contamination that causes grid emission and thermal
> >runaway besides long term loss of emission, 
> >but I cannot recall seeing any firm statements on the ill effects on 
> >undervoltage, except low initial emission.
> >
> >In the "old days" of UHF Class C amplifiers it was common to derate the 
> >oxide cathode filament voltage to compensate
> >for RF losses and electron back-bombardment of the cathode and a 
> >consequent increase in surface temperature.
> 
> ***  I've heard of cases in the 2GHz range where it was found that 
> back-bombardment was such that the heater potential could be removed 
> shortly after nominal RF output was achieved -- i.e., the cathode 
> temperature was being maintained by the RF.
> >
> >...

If I remember correctly, this was normal procedure for
a lot of cavity magnetrons, as soon as RF pulses were detected at the output
a relay was expected to reduce or turn off the filament current.

73/

K-A
SM0AOM

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>