Re: [Amps] 10 DB increase

["Radioal" <al.dolgosh@hamradio.org>]

I am not questioning the fact that this was measured - only the basis for 
believing that what was measured had no other explanation than to disprove 
physical law.  I suggest that something else may be at work here to skew the 
measurements.  The challenge is to find the reason for it, not believe 
blindly in it.

Al - K8EUR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org>
To: "Radioal" <al.dolgosh@hamradio.org>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>; "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 10 DB increase


> On Feb 5, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Radioal wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "R. Measures" <r@somis.org>
> > To: "Radioal" <al.dolgosh@hamradio.org>
> > Cc: <amps@contesting.com>; "Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 10:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Amps] 10 DB increase
> >
> >
> > > > The ionosphere is not a parametric amplifier being pumped by solar 
> > > > energy - there are some weird theories floating around that have not 
> > > > been proven.
> > >
> > > So why did a 20db amplifier deliver 23db during certain conditions and 
> > > 20db at other times?
> > > >
> > Why assume something to be true that violates known physical laws?
>
> I assumed not, I measured.  This was what trusted friends had been 
> occasionally reporting for months.  I was only able to confirm what they 
> occasionally measured after I sold the amplifier.
>
> > The scientific assumption should be that it is an anomaly, and effort 
> > should be made to prove IT true rather than use the single fact to cast 
> > doubt on known reality.
>
> There were many measurements by others.  I was one of the last measurers.
>
> Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps