That's why we have the ARRL to sort this out for the masses.
-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of R.Measures
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 12:32 PM
To: Gudguyham@aol.com
Cc: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean
On Jan 9, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Gudguyham@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 1/9/2006 11:22:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> g8gsq@eltac.co.uk writes:
>
> Depends on the amplifier type and design, but the most significant
> factor is usually the rf device and how hard it's run. On tube
> amplifiers, operator adjustment is likely to dominate over everything
> else.
>
When compared with the average radio, even a 3-500Z has about a tenth
the total IMD.
>
>
>
> I will second that!
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|