Bill said: "I do take exception to the part about "not technically able...".
Hams
can do anything the commercial boys can do, it's a matter of desire,
not ability."
Response: No question that many are technically competent - but the FCC does
not hold us to commercial standards. They consider us amateurs, for better or
worse. Rules are written for the least competent, rather than the most
competent.
Colin K7FM
-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
>Sent: Jan 9, 2006 8:12 AM
>To: k7fm <k7fm@teleport.com>, Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>,
>amps@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [Amps] Westinghouse BC Ammeter QX-37
>
>
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>At 06:46 AM 1/9/2006, k7fm wrote:
>>I can vouch for being near the one that is cleaner. The difference
>>is light night and day if you are close by. I would much rather be
>>near an amp that exceeded the norm.
>>
>>Most amateur amps do not meet the commercial standard for distortion
>>products - which may be a recognition that we are "amateurs" and not
>>technically able to meet commercial standards. Hooray for those
>>that do want a cleaner amp.
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>Ok, makes sense. I'm not near any active hams, so I've never noticed
>what you have.
>
>I do take exception to the part about "not technically able...". Hams
>can do anything the commercial boys can do, it's a matter of desire,
>not ability.
>
>Bill, W6WRT
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|