Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] MW Oven Transformer question

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] MW Oven Transformer question
From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Reply-to: craxd1@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:07:29 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
If you want to add turns to the primary (if there's enough room, and should be 
with the secondary removed), you can do a simple test to see how many turns to 
add. First, use the formulas I published last week about figuring the core size 
and number of turns to find the correct number of turns for the core size you 
have. Next, connect the primary to 120 Vac and wind a 10 turn coil secondary. 
Take that secondary voltage and divide it by the 10 turns. That will be the 
turns per volt. Last, wind the extra turns you've found you need by the 
formulas and the known turns per volt. One good thing on this transformer in 
question, the primary is on the inside. If on the outside, you'd be screwed on 
removing the secondary.

Best,

Will

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 3/21/06 at 11:42 AM John Popelish wrote:

>TexasRF@aol.com wrote:
>
>> Not what I hoped to hear but I appreciate the good info! 
>
>If you have a supply of this kind of landfill, you might put two 
>similar units side by side, wire the primaries in series (effectively 
>halving the volts per turn, so eliminating the saturation problems). 
>Then you can knock the shunts out and wind a similar secondary on each 
>(doubling the number of turns to compensate for the half primary 
>voltage) and wire those two secondaries in parallel.  This gives you a 
>reasonably efficient transformer (that won't overheat without a fan) 
>with about a kVA rating.
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>