Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Quad Tube 4cx800 hf amp

To: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Quad Tube 4cx800 hf amp
From: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 04:55:27 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On May 26, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:

> Phil,
>
> The 8660 is the equivalent to the 4CX1500B,
> The driver tubes are 8122 I found out.
>
> Again, if I drive a 8171 to not more then 1,5KW output ever,
> it should be tuned for that power, not for 20KW

However, if an 8171 is tuned for max suds in AB1, it is easy to back  
the mic. gain down to the point where it produces 1500w in Class A --  
resulting in superb linearity.  In the event that more power is  
needed to communicate, one merely advances the mic. gain.  In the  
event that 1500w is too much, one can run barefoot or turn down the  
mic. gain even more.  .
>
> 73
> Peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Clements [mailto:philc@texascellnet.com]
>
>
>
>> You are claiming that two 8660 tubes drive another pair of 8660  
>> tubes?
>
> No, there is only one pair of driver tubes in class A.
>
>
>
>>
>> The original posting meant eventually that the output network  
>> should be
>> adjusted for the power to be operated and not to that the tubes are
>> capable
>> of.
>
> I disagree with that premise.
>
>> That does not mean that parts could not be oversized.
>
> Bigger is usually mo bettah! I over-engineer everything.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>