Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED

To: R L Measures <r@somis.org>, Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED
From: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:30:29 +0200 (CEST)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Provided that the grid parasitic tuned circuit is resonant at a higher 
frequency than the anode parasitic tuned circuit, the amplifier will be stable. 
Unless Terman got it wrong........
This suggests that well grounded grid through say a collet ring fixture may 
well not need an anode parasitic suppressor if the rest of the design is right 
- and that may need all sorts of niceties taking into account, such as the 
amount of shielding adding capacity to the anode circuit.. It also suggests why 
572Bs are such wotsits to keep free of parasitics, they having a lengthy grid 
structure.
Very often, parasitic suppressors are fitted on a 'belt and braces' ('belt and 
suspenders' in American English!) basis, and are determined experimentally - 
even on big transmitters. I suppose one of the EM modelling programs could 
predict the result if you had good enough models of everything in the box, but 
the usual approach may well provide suppressors where they aren't needed.
73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>