Joe -- Since 3-500Zs do not have an indirectly-heated cathode, the
only issue about overdriving them is non-linearity.
On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Joe Isabella wrote:
> Normally I stay out of these, but in this case I have to say
> We're not building bridges here where people can lose their lives
> if a design stretches tolerances a bit. Granted, you could be out
> a few hundred bucks if you screw up a tube, but multiple deaths are
> not a result of overdriving a tube.
> I don't care how good of an engineer you are, nobody has been able
> to build common sense into their designs. Everybody wants the
> world in a box that auto-tunes, auto-adjusts drive, auto-shuts down
> if something is wrong, and auto-troubleshoots itself when it
> breaks. Then they want a 3 kW version for $1,000. Folks, you get
> what you pay for -- Alphas get close. I happen to work on 500 and
> 1000W amps that nearly do everything I just mentioned made by
> Harris for the military. No, they don't run the "illegal limit",
> but they're pretty robust. Trust me, you don't want to buy one of
> those "NIB" from the manufacturer...
> I'm happy with my 3K-A. Paid less than a grand for it, 2kW+ out,
> and tubes that cost $300 for two. "What-a-baagin"!!
> Joe, N3JI
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Will Matney <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 7:39:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] IM distortion and such
> It's according to what kind of audio amp. Guitar amps are designed
> to purposely introduce distortion. That's where the squeal of the
> electric guitar comes from. The bands actually prefer this.
> However, if one is an engineer, and you have a maximum rating
> curve, it is a liability to ever go outside the curve into the over
> load region. That's like saying I'll put my stamp on this bridge
> which I know is going to deflect more than allowable published
> tolerances, and that I think it can get by with the added stress,
> even though I am over the maximum curves for tensile and yield
> strength. Then an automobile drives over it and falls in the river.
> Who's liable? Whether electrical or mechanical engineering, an
> engineer should always look at this. Though running a tube out of
> spec probably wont kill anyone, the manufacturer better be ready to
> replace tubes or the entire amp if the customer is dissatisfied as
> a suit will sure follow if they don't. If ran in spec, one has
> nothing to
> y about, and has published data to fall back on. This from an
> engineers point of view.
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
> On 6/25/06 at 4:00 PM k7fm wrote:
>> Tom said:
>> "I think you are really saying an engineer shouldn't ever
>> design outside what is actually published on a spec sheet
>> that only covers a limited number of situations under any
>> condition, even if the component manufacturer, field
>> history, or direct testing show otherwise."
>> It might be easier to grasp what Tom is saying if you think of audio
>> amplifiers. Assume a tube manufacturer specifies a tube for audio
>> distortion. However, the manufacturer of the audio amplifier is
>> minimum distortion. If he finds that running the tube outside of the
>> specified by the tube manufacturer gives consistently lower
>> it would be good engineering to do so. In some cases, tubes
>> might be
>> selected for those parameters that met the goals of the engineer.
>> In some
>> cases, the plate dissipation might be exceeded to get closer to
>> class A.
>> Colin K7FM
> Amps mailing list
> Amps mailing list
R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
Amps mailing list