Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Life and gain of 3-500Z

To: Peter Voelpel <df3kv@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Life and gain of 3-500Z
From: R L Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:09:40 -0700
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Jul 18, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote:

> When I recently repaired a TL-922 for a friend the original tubes  
> where
> replaced by RFP 3-500ZG.
> There was no adjustment necessary to the input circuits, if I  
> remember right
> the idling current in SSB Position was 180mA.
> The amp was wired for 240V, fed by 235V, of course run at 50Hz.
> To me the tubes looked pretty hot compared to the QB4/1100 I run in  
> my L4B.
> I measured 1300W out driven at 90W key down.
>
> No idea how it behaves with Eimac tubes as the originals were bad.

What was wrong with them, Peter?
>
> 73
> Peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps- 
> bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Phil Clements
>
>>> Lower mu generally indicates higher input impedance, more
>>> negative feedback, and less gain in a g-g amplifier. In a
>>> g-g amp gain is mostly determine by the ratio of load
>>> impedance to driving impedance, and higher mu tubes
>>> generally have a lower cathode drive impedance.
>
> Assuming it is correct that the Chinese tubes are higher mu, and  
> higher gain
> than an Eimac, the zsac would be higher, and the input vswr would  
> change,
> with the same HV and bias voltages applied?
>
> (((73)))
> Phil Clements, K5PC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>

R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org



_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>