Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Russian power L-coupler

To: <amps@contesting.com>, "Bill Fuqua" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Russian power L-coupler
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:10:51 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
> Sorry I meant 180 degrees. The point is if it is used in 
> an application
> where a high Q is not needed there would be no problem 
> because the
> circulating currents would not be high.

I don't think everyone has a grasp of how poor that design 
is for wide range inductances.

Let's assume it takes 20 feet of #12 wire to have enough 
inductance to cover 160 meters. On ten meters the same 20 
feet of wire is there, along with all the distributed 
capacitance (that is what really kills Q) of the coil large 
enough for 160.

>Often they were used to fill in the
> gaps between taps of larger coils. In a L-tuner and 
> reasonable impedance
> ratios the Q would be on the order of 2 to 5. And the 
> Inductor would be in
> series with either the input or the output impedance thus 
> would not see any
> higher currents than either of them. If the antenna 
> feedline or the coax
> from the amplifier were  #10 wire and the varicoupler was 
> in series with
> one of them and was made of same size wire, why would it 
> melt down first?

.....because current in the coil is not the same as the 
terminal current entering or leaving the coil when the coil 
has significant distributed capacitance. That is what kills 
the Q more than anything. Like trying to do a plate choke 
that has all those turns hanging there and covers 160-10 
without burning up on some bands....or like trying to do a 
tank circuit and not shorting the unused turns in the 
inductor.

> My point was that in certain applications it would be 
> better because you
> would not have to worry about contact corrosion or roller 
> arcing or any of
> that stuff.

Instead we trade a simple problem like an occasional roller 
arcing for an inductor that is crummy all the time. It has 
severe series resonance problems over wide ranges of 
frequency, and serious Q problems over wide ranges of 
inductance.

Maybe if we had a good fixed inductor of 20uH with switch 
taps and wanted a trimmer of +-4uH it would be a good idea. 
A variometer in series with a tapped inductor is a workable 
idea, if the frequency range or inductance range is limited.

I don't think people realize how poor a system that really 
is. It isn't a good system for large inductance changes. It 
isn't good for large frequency changes. The reason we don't 
see them much isn't because people haven't heard of them. 
The reason we don't see variometer inductors is they are 
limited to narrow frequency or inductance range 
applications.

73 Tom 


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>