| To: | Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>, Peter Voelpel <df3kv@t-online.de>,amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network |
| From: | Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk> |
| Reply-to: | g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:56:03 +0200 (CEST) |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Tom said: >It's pretty tough and very expensive to obtain the perceived harmonic advantages of a pi-L in the real world of multi-band amps. It's much cheaper to do it other ways.< So why did so many professional continuous coverage QRO amps (7.5kW and up) go to the trouble of a pi-L then? I know of at least 4 different manufacturers who did so.... 73 Peter W6/G3RZP this week _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network, Tom W8JI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Amps] Sb-200 question, Gudguyham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network, Peter Chadwick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Pi-L Network, Tom W8JI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |