Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 2 Tubes in Parrallel:

To: "Bruce Osterberg" <n9bx@mchsi.com>, <Amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 2 Tubes in Parrallel:
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:00:45 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
This has been covered any number of times and is archived.

In a few words: Handbook obsession with a Q of 12 is meaningless. If you 
notice the circuits used by many manufacturers over the years they all use 
the same components across several models.

With the low output C of the 8877's there wont even be problems getting 
enough Tune C at 10M to give good efficiency.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Osterberg" <n9bx@mchsi.com>
To: <Amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:59 PM
Subject: [Amps] 2 Tubes in Parrallel:


>
> From What I read when you have two tubes in Parallel, Like two 3-500
> the RL is 1/2 of what it would normally be if one tube was used.  Since
> the good people at Ameritron have shown us the schematics for the Al-84,
> (2-3550), al-1200 and al-1500.  I wonder why all of the same components
> are used in both AMPS?  Like Tank circuit and Capacitance Values.  Does
> this not effect the operating Q of the final Tank circuit?
>
> I only ask this in hopes that someone could shed some light on my quest
> to build a 2 x 8877 Amp.
>
> If I had 3600 Volts on the Plates of Two tubes, and figuring 1.82 x 1.5
> amps that should give me a RL of 1318.  Or 1300.  Should I design my
> Tank circuit for that value?  In everything I read this is Correct.
> Please give me your thoughts.
>
> 73 Bruce N9BX
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>