Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic?

To: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic?
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:20:18 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The primary advantage of ceramic is that many are higher power than the 
glass. You also pay a lot more up front and for replacement. The AL-1200 is 
capable of 2200W+ output as are the pair of 3CX800 amps. However the 3CX1200 
is much more forgiving for tuning errors or antenna problems.

Glass, as in the 3-500Z, is good up to around the 1500W level, readily 
available and still reasonably priced.

Carl
KM1H




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R. David Eagle" <kb8nnu@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 9:34 AM
Subject: [Amps] Glass Vs. Ceramic?


> Hello all...I'm in the process of scouting around for an amp and was 
> wondering what some of the main advantages would be to a ceramic tube 
> versus a glass one...???  I was looking at the Ameritron Al-1200 which 
> uses the 3CX1200.  Is it worth going to ceramic?
>
> any thoughts would be appreciated....
>
> Dave
> KB8NNU
>
>
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster 
> Total Access, No Cost.
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>