Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] RL Calculations

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "'Amps Reflector'" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] RL Calculations
From: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:34:42 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Plus, if the Q strays a little from the current favored 12, who cares.

Bob W6TR
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "'Amps Reflector'" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2009 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] RL Calculations


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:25:56 -0500, "Phil Clements"
> <philc@texascellnet.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>That is the correct academic answer, Bill, but in the real world, if he 
>>sets
>>up the tank for 1200-1300 ohms, the difference cannot be measured.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Agreed. The formula implies a greater precision than is actually
> achieved, since the factor of 1.8 is somewhat arbitrary to begin with.
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>