Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "'Robert Groh'" <rgroh@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?
From: "Alex Eban" <alexeban@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:06:05 +0300
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Probably the best thing to do is to unscrew the shaft and then screw it
slightly in until it just contacts the internal plunger. This is so that the
mechanism won't rattle in transit. Apart from that, just do what Bill said:
pack it well and then some more!
Alex    4Z5KS

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill, W6WRT
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 8:21 PM
To: Robert Groh
Cc: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Question: Ship Vacuum Variables at minimum or maximum?

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT), Robert Groh
<rgroh@swbell.net> wrote:

>
>Comments and advice welcome. The vacuum variables are Jennings UCS and
UCSL, by the way, if that matters.

REPLY:

That's a very good question Robert, but I think the best way is to
pack them so well it doesn't matter. I'm not trying to be a smarty
here, it's just that they are so delicate in any configuration that
you can't hardly have too much foam around them. The box should be
many times larger than the capacitor and well stuffed. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>