Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] PEER REVIEW

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] PEER REVIEW
From: donroden@hiwaay.net
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:00:55 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

I think it's against the law to peer in our community......
Don WA4NPL


Quoting Herzog <herzog@frontiernet.net>:

> ref:  >We all this peer group, just unpaid, and only mildly biased.
>    >There are enough opinions to cancel out, and hover about the real
> magical truths.
>    >K2LB
>
>    REPLY:
>
>    Peer reviews should be done before publication, not after.
>
>    73, Bill W6WRT
> ==============
> Herzog had hoped my status was that YOU are peers.
>
> OK, MY WIFE, my real peer for jury trials, has PRE READ THIS MESSAGE
> BEFORE I SENT IT.
>
> If you peers also approve my previous ramblings, please send them on for
> publication; and keep 20 percent of the publisher's proceeds for your
> trouble..K2LB
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>