Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Suggestion.....

To: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Suggestion.....
From: Jack Parker <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:22:26 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Amen, George! I had just that experience with the ICOM reflector. Nothing
untoward got to the list, just a business transaction, but I did *not* check
the address(es) first before hitting send...just not used to that
configuration.


On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com> wrote:

> Hello George,
>
> I like it the way it is.....people just have to be disciplined to using
> "reply all" when they want their response to go to the list...which they
> should in most cases.  I've always made it a habit to always check the
> addresses I'm sending e-mail to before I hit "send".
>
>
> 73,
>
> Gary K9GS
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> K9GS
> Gary Schwartz           email: k9gs (at) arrl.net
> Check out K9NS on the web: http://www.k9ns.com
> Society of Midwest Contesters (SMC)     http://www.w9smc.com/
> GMDXA http://www.eng.mu.edu/gmdxa/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "George Fremin III" <geoiii@kkn.net>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2009 11:40 AM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Suggestion.....
>
>
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 12:27:20PM -0500, Jim Dawson wrote:
> >
> >> Can we change this group so when you click "Reply" in your mail
> >> client it goes to the group and not to the individual? If it is
> >> important enough to post to the group, most likely so is the
> >> response.  Jim - K9DD
> >
> >
> > Since I am the "list owner" (which does not mean much really) I will
> > weigh in here and say that I do not feel that would be a good change
> > and I would not make that change without almost everyone on the list
> > agreeing to such a change.
> >
> > To further expand on it a bit, in my experience as the mailman admin
> > and a system admin for lists.contesting.com and for another domain
> > that hosts 500 email lists I can tell you that, in general, the
> > 'reply-to list' option can be the cause of more trouble in the form of
> > private messages going to the list than it is ever worth. It almost
> > always results in unintended personal attacks or private information
> > being posted to a list. In addition I feel that it lowers the signal
> > to noise ratio of a list since replies that really do not benefit the
> > list as a whole get broadcast to the list by default. I think it is a
> > good thing that posting to a list of hundreds or thousands of people
> > be more difficult than hitting the default reply button and typing.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > George Fremin III - K5TR
> > geoiii@kkn.net
> > http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amps mailing list
> > Amps@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>



-- 
Jack, W6NF
Silver Springs, NV
DM09ji
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>