Which proves my point.
Carl
> Carl wrote:
>> Most of us have no problem making on the fly mental adjustments
>> especially
>> if the new subject line better explains the subject.
>
> Which is rarely the case. For example, the question about "Powering up
> after
> several years" was changed to "Powering up 3K". While the original poster
> had a
> Henry 3K Premier, the fact remains that the content was just as relevant
> to many
> items of ham kit, not just a Henry 3K Premier, so I fail to see how
> changing
> the subject line improved matters.
>
>>
>> PhD's OTOH........ We all have our favorite stories about them (-;
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
>
> Perhaps you can explain how these three Subject headers explain the
> subject
> better, since this particular PhD can't work out why.
>
> * LCR meter
> * LCR mteter
> * lcr meter
>
> Since posting this, we have another two subject headers:
>
> * More LCR meters and measurements.
> * More LCR mters and meaurements.
>
> And just to make it even harder to follow, some people are using
>
> ## someone else wrote ...
>
> to indicate what they are resonding to. Why the hell they don't set their
> email
> client to use the less than sign (<) like almost everyone else, I do not
> know.
>
>
> Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|