Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:41:52 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 08:39:45 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>> Of course the main L should be very low
>>loss and the complete suppressor should not absorb any of the desired HF
>>power.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Not absorb "any" of the desired HF power?
>
> That is impossible and Carl should know better than to make such a
> statement. The trick is to keep the power loss on the highest HF band
> as low as possible while still providing enough de-Qing at the VHF
> parasitic frequency. A certain amount of cut and try is often
> necessary.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT


I chose my words for the sake of brevity and the ideal situation. Do you 
have a problem with that or are you just up to the usual nit picking so you 
can see your words on the screen?

You remind me of another who is no longer with the forum...

Carl
KM1H




_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>