Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question

To: <donroden@hiwaay.net>, "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] No parasitic choke question
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:43:59 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Its easy when you copy established designs and info. Amp building IS NOT 
that hard. Even CBers do it........

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <donroden@hiwaay.net>
To: "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:22 AM
Subject: [Amps] No parasitic choke question


> There seems to be three camps in this discussion..
> Nychrome, no nychrome, and now neither.
>
> Eliminate the parasitic; eliminate the suppressor.
>
> \If eliminating the suppressor can :
> ( 1 )  produce less heating above 20Mhz
> ( 2 )  protect the tube and associated components
>
> I believe a lot of us would like to know your better way.
>
> Thanks
>
> Don WA4NPL
>
>
>
> Quoting "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>:
>
>> My amps do not need or have VHF parasitic suppressors.
>> I came to realize that tubes can be made to not oscillate in
>> other, better ways.
>>
>> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>