Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] More parasitic choke questions
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:36:46 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:11:22 +0200, "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de> wrote:

>Why is that [not absoring any HF power] impossible?   
>On HF the resistor is almost shorted out by the inductor.
>The power absorbed will be less then 0.5% of the desired HF with a typical
>amp.

REPLY:

You answered your own question. Almost shorted out is not the same as
shorted out, and .5% is not the same as zero. 

Some people have a bad habit of taking a very small value and rounding
it off to zero. Sometimes it doesn't matter, sometimes it does. In
this case, it does. 

I'll say it again:  A conventional VHF parasitic suppressor is going
to dissipate significant HF energy when running on the higher HF
bands. The trick is to get the inductance low enough to bypass most of
the HF energy around the resistor while still having enough inductance
to effectively suppress the parasitic. The balance between the two is
not super critical but it often takes some cut and try to get it
right. Even commercial amp makers don't always get it right as
evidenced by many burned up suppressor resistors. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>