Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Pulse tuning

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Pulse tuning
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:14:30 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:45:28 -0700
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Pulse tuning

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:23:51 +0800, Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
wrote:

>
>That's exactly my point. You keep presenting my argument for me.
>
>By tuning up at 100% duty, your are not tuning to 100% output because 
>your voltage has sagged.
>
>With pulse tuning at 30% for example, you eliminate that voltage sag 
>problem and you are tuning much closer to that ideal 100%.

REPLY:

No, you are missing my point. By tuning up at 100% and getting some
voltage sag, when you go to a lower duty cycle like SSB you have less
sag and more headroom. Thus less likely to splatter, and equal or
slightly more power output. 

Bill, W6WRT

##  say what ?  Not a  chance.   Tune up with say 1200-1500w out
CXR,   VS pulse tuning with a 20-30% duty..and watch the diff on
the pep wattmeter. 

## if you pulse tune to 1.5 kw pep out, then switch to SSB, you will be dead on.
If you tune to 1.5 kw, with a CXR, then switch to ssb,  B+ is no longer 
sagging..and
PO is up a bit.   Amp was never tuned up for the higher power,cuz of the lower 
duty
cycle.   IF you had gone back and pulse tuned it, you would have seen the po 
increase
to 1600-1700w pep.     With the  amp pulse tuned to 1600-1700w pep out, and 
drive
reduced, so amp is putting out only 1.5 kw pep, now you do have some heardroom. 

##  if u insist on tuning with a cxr,  at least, when done,   overcouple the 
loading a bit, till
the po drops 2% [30w].  Now you have effectively got the  loading where it 
should be.   

Jim  VE7RF
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>