Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7

To: "Roger \(sub1\)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:49:48 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Harmonic and spurious attenuation rules are stricter there. Easy to meet 
with a stub or LPF.

Carl
KM1H




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger (sub1)" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
To: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Cc: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 3CX1000A7


> On 11/16/2010 9:37 PM, Carl wrote:
>> Because it doesnt meet FCC specs
> In what way?  Just never approved yet?
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>>
>> Carl
>> KM1H
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>