Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] MOVs

To: ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net, amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] MOVs
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:08:03 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 11/25/2010 12:53 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
The original post for this thread has not shown up here yet.
>>    A similar thing happened with garden variety  130 v rated MOV's....
>> too many house fires.  Modern MOV's  for 120/240 v use, will  have a 3rd 
>> lead sticking out [offset to one side]
>> and an internal fuse built into em.
>>
>>
A 130V MOV on the 120V AC line would get hot in a hurry 1,414 * 120 = 
169.7V so the thing would be conducting a high percentage of the time.  
You'd want at least a 180V MOV.
>   I don't understand how this can be a useful device. I thought that MOVs
> were supposed to draw lots of current, instead of letting it got
> elsewhere causing damage to more expensive and sensitive electronics.
That is correct, but an under sized, under rated MOV could cause a fire 
by itself.
>   I
> had always thought of MOVs as sort of "sacrificial" devices, intended to
> blow up under the worst power surges,
They are.
>   and mounted  inside a metal
> cabinet so that when they do blow up nothing else is damaged.
Unfortunately many omitted this part.
> I would
> never mount an MOV where it could set fire to something else.
>
Many did. <:-))  MOV's are, or used to be, rated by their breakdown 
voltage.  So people were purchasing 130V MOVs for 120 V AC lines 
forgetting, or not knowing, the peak voltage is 1.414 times the RMS.
> DE N6KB
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
73

Roger (K8RI)

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>