| To: | lists@subich.com, amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State (was) Expert Amps 2K-FA: Any Opinions ? |
| From: | K8MLM@aol.com |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:12:29 -0400 (EDT) |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Joe, This is getting interesting. Please explain below statement. I know the FCC is kind-of backward, but why is it impractical? In a message dated 4/29/2012 8:43:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, lists@subich.com writes: A well designed amplifier using 8 VRF-2933 or a pair of the Motorola/ Phillips 1200W TV transmitter "bricks" could be done commercially at a price that is competitive with the top of the line Alpha but FCC rules make it very impractical for any US manufacturer to bother to do so. Thanks, Bob K8MLM _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Amps] Dishtronixs DX2400L1, Marten - VE2WU |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State (was) Expert Amps 2K-FA: Any Opinions ?, W2XJ |
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Dishtronixs DX2400L1, Marten - VE2WU |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Tubes vs. Solid State (was) Expert Amps 2K-FA: Any Opinions ?, Paul Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |