| To: | Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>,<amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Babying radios conclusion |
| From: | Charles Bibb <zedkay@telepak.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:58:14 -0500 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
At 10:49 PM 6/14/2012, Charles Harpole wrote: >So my questions 1 and 2 remain in my weak mind. But, I am sure >right now that a ham operator can NOT "baby" his correctly designed >and correctly operated radio after he turns it on and uses it. Hey, Charlie Relax. Kick back. Have a glass of wine while pondering the impermanence of all things. ;-) 73, Charles - K5ZK _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] opening up a transformer, k7fm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] filament instant heating query, Carl |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Babying radios conclusion 2, Roger (K8RI) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Babying radios conclusion, k7fm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |