That's what I was trying to imply. The writer of the original post on
the matter seemed to have the idea that a 4CX1500B was not as good as a
4CX1000A.
David
KW4DH
On 6/20/2012 3:28 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 20:08, David C. Hallam <dhallam@knology.net> wrote:
>> It's my understand that a 4CX1500B is a direct replacement for a
>> 4CX1000A with a plus that it has an extra 500W dissipation capability.
>>
>> David
>> KW4DH
> I don't think they are as similar as you think. The 4CX1500B is a
> better tube overall. See data sheeets on my site - www.g8wrb.org
>
> dave
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|