Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 4CX1500B project
From: Vic K2VCO <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 09:02:54 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
That's an idea. I was thinking about a CW/SSB switch labeled "IMD ON/OFF". It 
could change 
plate, grid and screen voltages.

I don't think I'll go as far as class C, though. I can get 1500 watts in AB1 
without 
having to worry about additional harmonic output or sharpening the keying. It 
might not 
even be possible: this tube has only a few watts of grid dissipation so you 
don't want to 
drive the grid positive.

On 8/9/2012 8:42 AM, Carl wrote:
> Have you considered using a switchable PS that runs FWB and FWD? One switch 
> or vacuum
> relay and you have 2 voltages. Consider 3500VDC for Class C (not too deep on 
> the bias tho)
> CW and 1750V for a real clean SSB.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vic K2VCO" <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
> To: "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:06 PM
> Subject: [Amps] 4CX1500B project
>
>
>> I've been thinking about my next project for some time, and I can't seem to 
>> shake the idea
>> of an 160-10M amplifier using the 4CX1500B. The tubes and the beautiful 
>> SK-800B socket are
>> just burning a hole in my workbench, as it were.
>>
>> So I am thinking of running it in AB1 according to the parameters in the 
>> 4CX1000 datasheet
>> -- 3kV on the plate, 325V on the screen and -60V bias. This will give me 
>> full legal output
>> from one tube.  It is possible to reduce the bias and screen voltage and run 
>> it closer to
>> class A for much better IMD, but as a CW operator I'd prefer a few more 
>> watts (actually, a
>> CW/SSB switch is a possibility).
>>
>> I am considering a grid-driven circuit with a 50 ohm swamping resistor. It 
>> seems to me
>> that it would require 60v peak to just overcome the bias, which comes out to 
>> 72 watts
>> drive for AB1 operation. Is this a reasonable assumption?
>>
>> This configuration would make it unnecessary to build and fiddle with a 
>> tuned input
>> circuit. I'm also thinking about using the G3SEK tetrode board, which would 
>> solve a lot of
>> little problems in one package.
>>
>> Does anyone have comments or suggestions?
>>
>> --
>> Vic, K2VCO
>> Fresno CA
>> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2437/5189 - Release Date: 08/09/12
>>
>

-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>