Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 151, Issue 6

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 151, Issue 6
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:44:56 -0600
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Thanks everyone for the responses, both on the reflector and direct.

Is there any particular reason the L-C-L T-match is better or worse than the more standard C-L-C pi network in this application ?

Thanks,
Steve, N2IC

On 07/07/2015 11:55 AM, Steve via Amps wrote:
Hi Steve,

I converted an SB-220 to 6 meters for my friend Mike, UN8GC, and wrote up
the results  in a QST article in April 2008. The input circuit I used was a
T-match. Each inductor consisted of  10 turns of  #22 gauge  enameled wire,
tuned with a 50 pf capacitor (which was mounted where the  bandswitch used
to be. )
Have fun!


Steve  Gilbert
K1SG
K1SG@AOL.com
774-292-1948


In a message dated 7/7/2015 12:23:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
amps-request@contesting.com writes:


Message: 3
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 07:21:14 -0600
From:  Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
To: amps@contesting.com
Subject:  [Amps] SB-220 6 meter input network
Message-ID:  <559BD24A.5070206@arrl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8;  format=flowed

I am converting a previously-modified SB-220 to a 6  meter-only amp.

The original input pi-network is long gone. Most of the  articles on
conversion say stuff like "remove N turns from the original 10  meter
input coil". Can anyone tell me component values for the 2  capacitors
and the inductor for a 6 meter input network ?

Thanks  and 73,
Steve,  N2IC


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>