[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow

To: Jim Garland <>
Subject: Re: [Amps] "Conventional" current flow
From: Mike Waters <>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:36:56 -0600
List-post: <">>
I was following this story from the beginning. What really jumped out at me
is that they had already predicted the shape of the chirp's waveform years
before (with a mathematical model, of course)! And both the actual waveform
and the model's prediction of it were nearly identical!

I wish I could understand very advanced mathematics so that I could grasp
exactly how various types of modeling work. But that's OT. ;-)

73, Mike

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Jim Garland <> wrote:

> ... The chirp arrived at the Washington detector first, and then about 7
> mS later, it arrived at the Louisiana detector, which was the transit time
> for light. That is in accord with Einstein's theory. The recordings of the
> chirp waveform are also in complete agreement with general relativity
> predictions about black holes. ...
Amps mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>