Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Super Cathode Driven Tetrodes

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>, Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net>, "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Super Cathode Driven Tetrodes
From: "Fuqua, William" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:40:36 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Sorry for typo error. Low mu.

There should be no reason for this configuration be any less stable that the 
usual high-mu triode grounded grid

amplifier, if fact should be more stable due to lower gain.

73

Bill wa4lav



________________________________
From: Carl <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2018 8:37 PM
To: Fuqua, William; Jim Thomson; amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Super Cathode Driven Tetrodes


----- Original Message -----
From: Fuqua, William
To: Carl ; Jim Thomson ; amps@contesting.com

Ok,
    Now that this discussion has gone on for some time, and everyone has had
a opportunity to read various articles, here is the question.
Can anyone give me a reason why a cathode driven tetrode with the control
grid connected directly to
the cathode be unstable. The screen grid is connected directly to ground.
Lot mu grounded grid configuration.


73
Bill wa4lav

I believe I already answered that days ago....poor
construction...layout....shielding.....component choices...etc.
Hammy Hambone at his best.

Carl


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avg.com&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cwlfuqu00%40uky.edu%7Ce6cab5a83a1e4535741108d63d36b30c%7C2b30530b69b64457b818481cb53d42ae%7C0%7C0%7C636763702480007227&amp;sdata=1NI5k%2FbUpAgmmeYdkwm8p6Qby7pXiTuffh5gq40UpBg%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>