At 03:17 PM 10/31/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>I found it interesting, some of the ones opposed to lumping the SO and
>SOA together, are the same ones who are opposed to some indication of 1
>radio vs. 2 radio in the standings. Just turn the arguments around, and
>you'll know how a lot of us 1 radio guys feel about having our scores
>compared to the 2 radio guys.
>
I agree with many of your arguments for a distinction between 1-radio
and 2-radio distinction in results (just as there should be an
indication SO vs. SOA). However, how do you handle the FT-1000D,
since it provides fully independent receive? Coupled with an auto-
QSY and tune amplifier (with a little station construction ingenuity),
an FT-1000D equipped station can be QRO 2-radio station if the station
designer and operator make full use of the capability.
73,
... Joe Subich, W8IK ex-AD8I
<w8ik@ibm.net>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|