Or maybe it would be even faster if PED could be set up to emulate TRLog...
73 - John, W4AU
At 12:17 5/18/01 -0400, you wrote:
>I found the same problem when setting the speed in the 70-80
>WPM range. My brain just stops working after a while. Going
>slower (60-66 WPM) gives me much steadier runs till the end, and
>most importantly, copying calls correctly the first time, which gives
>higher QSO totals in the long run.
>
>Regarding the max. QSO total, I think I"m close to my l;imit, as I
>can't type any faster. If DEFINEKEY worked in PED and I could
>move that + key over to ; or ' that would help.
>
>--
>Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com
>Newtown, PA FRC alternate: barry@w2up.wells.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>From Marijan Miletic" <Marijan@Miletic.net Fri May 18 20:28:20 2001
From: Marijan Miletic" <Marijan@Miletic.net (Marijan Miletic)
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dayton Topics past WRTC
Message-ID: <000701c0dfd0$b2ac45c0$2c48fea9@pentium>
OC Mauri, I4JMY wrote:
>Among the few parameters that are really possible to check there is accuracy.
>Penalties make very good sense and heavy penalties do punish who hasn't good
>hears and guess qsos .
Computer tehnolgy has made much greater leaps then amateur radio. Everybody
operates with databases or DX Cluster these days.
Pile-up simulators also help. Professional CW is dead so the operators are not
as good as they used to be but UBN is definitely down.
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|