>but efficiency too low compared with low signals.
Low band receiving antenna efficiency is limited by outside noise
which should be received some 10 dB stronger then own RX noise.
This is very easy to achieve with any of the present solid state RX
but some hams prefer additional preamps...
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
----- Original Message -----
From: <i4jmy@iol.it>
To: <py5eg@INEPAR.COM.BR>
Cc: <topband@contesting.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:07 AM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: Topband: TOP BAND RECEIVING ANTENNAS
>
>
> > The only problem is "Too many options".
> > In order to reciprocate such attention and support I must be a
> ctive
> > in 160 and 80 meters.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Oms PY5EG
>
> Hi Oms,
>
> I don't think there are finally so many options.
> You don't need compromise antennas whose main feature is to develop a
> null or antennas whose directivity is big but efficiency too low
> compared with low signals.
> Those solutions are excellent but better apply if there isn't room for
> larger antennas and to me they doesn't look ideal at your latitude and
> distance from continents.
> Knowing who You are, I mean your targets, and where your location is, I
> think arrays of stacked beverages heading Eu and Na are probably the
> best solution you can try.
>
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY
>
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|