What is happening here Jim is very interesting. A couple of years ago, DXer
went through this exercise for 'fiscal responsibility' which saw DXCC
monthly QST listings disappear and also the yearly QST listings which went
into a seperate 'yearbook'
At that time I said contesters would be next and should support efforts by
the DXers, but not much support came forth.
The DXers lost so I hope you do better. I would think tho you are just
around the corner for contest scores out of QST and onto the ARRL Web site,
a yearly contest scores yearbook, and then you might face a contest 'fee'
and no contest listing if NOT a ARRL member.
KI6T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim White, K4OJ" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>; <fcg@mailman.qth.net>
Cc: <w4rh@arrl.org>; <w4ru@arrl.org>; <n1nd@arrl.org>; <n7ng@arrl.org>;
<nt1n@arrl.org>; <k1zz@arrl.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:21 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] US/VE Hams: QST - Do we have a say in it?
>
> CONTESTERS PLEASE FORWARD TO YOUR CLUB REFLECTORS
>
>
> There is a rumor afoot regarding some possible changes to be made in the
> ARRL official journal QST.
>
> I am hoping someone in authority with my membership organization who is
> either addressed above or is on one of these reflectors will step forward
> and tell me a rumor I have heard is wrong.
>
> As I understand it, the rumor is that the SECTION NEWS AND detailed
> reporting of CONTESTS are on the table to be cut from QST...perhaps a
> summary of the high scorers will be still printed but Joe Ham will not see
> his call in QST.
>
> AGAIN this is NOT confirmed but I am very concerned.
>
> The measure of operator, not communicator, ability has always been the
> contest. During contests, amateurs can focus on developing their skills
and
> even if they are just starting out they still can see where they rank in
the
> big picture thanks to QST write-ups.
>
> Many MANY contesters have enjoyed watching their scores move higher and
> higher in their section listings as their operating ability improved, I
know
> I have over the past 30 years.
>
> As I understand it, all the listings may still be available, in obscurity,
> on the WWW, but not in front of the faces of your average ham...including
> the newcomer!
>
> Is this the beginning of the end of contesting? Once it is no longer in
> front of the faces of hams looking for new things to try and only the
> highest scores are published the guy who gets on to find his 100 QSOs is
> over a thousand shy of making it into print will undoubtedly say the heck
> with it.
>
> TO QUOTE A LETTER FROM W6OAT IN AN EARLY ISSUE OF NCJ:
>
>
> SOMETHING IS WRONG HERE
>
>
> This time it is my opinion that a very serious signal is about to be sent
> out by the ARRL as far as its views on the importance of contesting as a
> means to ensure a community of hams proficient in radio communications.
>
> AGAIN this is a rumor I have heard, I encourage clubs that support
> contesting to contact their members regarding this SHOULD THIS BE AN
> ACCURATE REPORT.
>
> I have gained many many friends in the contesting community over the past
30
> plus years and value all of my friendships with these hams from all over
the
> world...if we are about to see contesting get lip service by the ARRL -
the
> largest National membership organization of amateur radio operators -
well,
> I pray I am having a nightmare and someone will wake me up.
>
> HAS ANYONE HEARD ANYTHING ON THIS - I KNOW THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS
SLATED
> TO MEET SHORTLY AND SUSPECT THIS IS ON THE AGENDA - WERE YOU ASKED FOR
> INPUT?
>
> I do not want ham radio to be clear channels only allowed communication -
I
> have a cell phone and a computer on the web for that...lets keep radio
> OPERATING a part of ham radio.
>
> INFO NEEDED NOW - SOMEONE ENLIGHTEN THE MASSES BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
>
> 73,
>
> Jim White, K4OJ
> founder: Florida Contest Group - where operating ability is something we
> take pride in.
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>
>
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com
|