CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Log Checking - you guys are right

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking - you guys are right
From: k5zd@charter.net (Randy Thompson, K5ZD)
Date: Fri Nov 15 02:41:03 2002
That's the problem with the log checking.  Those other guys keep getting
credit for more QSOs than I did!!

Randy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-admin@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-admin@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Dale L Martin
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 16:33 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking - you guys are right
>
>
>  QSO with the non-entering station is valid.
> >
> > Otherwise, I would suggest that if the other station does not send in
> > a log, the credit should not be allowed for the QSO, because it is
> > impossible to verify that such a QSO actually took place.  I think
> > this should be implemented anyway for contests with no meaningful
> > exchange, such as CQWW.
> >
>
> Interesting.
>
> 2001 SS CW Contest netted 1301 logs (eyeball count -- I may be
> off a couple)
>
> Based on the above:
>
> K5ZD, with 1300 Q's, worked "everyone."
>
> But, then, the following worked more:
> N2NT  1302
> W4AN  1387
> WP3R  1457
> WP2Z  1314
> W5WMU 1394
> WX0B  1338
> N5RZ  1343
> W6EEN 1326
> KH6J  1386
> K9NS  1343
> N9RV  1306
> N2IC  1366
> K0RF  1355
> N0NI  1384
>
>
> 73,
> dale, kg5u
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>