CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Log Checking - you guys are right

Subject: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking - you guys are right
From: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham)
Date: Fri Nov 15 01:43:02 2002
AA4GA continued:

>Otherwise, I would suggest that if the other station does not send in
>a log, the credit should not be allowed for the QSO, because it is
>impossible to verify that such a QSO actually took place.  I think
>this should be implemented anyway for contests with no meaningful
>exchange, such as CQWW.
>
>These changes are easy to do within the log-checking framework we
>have now.  It's actually somewhat easier, in that there would be no
>human intervention required to determine if Us should be converted to
>Bs.  The only thing to add would be a small routine to delete all
>calls for which there was no log submitted.  That should be pretty
>easy.
>
>To do less is to lessen the integrity of the results.  Each and every
>QSO must be verified in some way or it should not count.  Anything
>less is indefensible.

Wah!  CQ/RJ WW RTTY was right after all.  I've been a clueless git like
Lee all this time.  Looking forward to working AA4GA in this one next year
& let's not miss out on KCJ, either.  I'll make four Qs in each & not turn in
a log if you will, too mate.  ;^)

73, BW2/VR2BrettGraham


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>