CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges

To: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges
From: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Reply-to: wrt@dslextreme.com
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 07:40:11 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:26:21 -0400 (EST), Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
wrote:

>It seems pretty clear to me that the exchange must
>be communicated in its entirety, even if part of it
>is "pro-forma."  I won't log a contact for which I
>don't get a complete exchange.  Am I just being
>a stickler for the rules, a hard headed conservative?

_________________________________________________________

I'd like to see rules revised to require a "true" signal report.  Logs
with endless 59 or 599 (sent) exchanges would be DQ'd.  I suppose some
evil person could write a program which generates random reports, but
at least the guy on the receiving end would have to copy what was
actually sent, not just what he knows is coming.

-- 
73, Bill W7TI

---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>