CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest

To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest
From: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:13:54 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yes but since I´m sure that over 90 percent do use
PC loging I can´t understand why so many dupes you.
In the CT9L M/2 CQWW CW operation that I took part
in we worked over 300 dupes and that is simply too
much, people has to shape up and be more carefull.

73 Jim SM2EKM
--------------------------------------

Bernie McClenny, W3UR wrote:

It's better to work them than refuse to work them.  If you don't work
them they will not call you next time (SS, WPX, other contests).  Also
the ones that dupe you are totally clueless and more than likely not in
the contest!

Bernie


-- Bernie McClenny, W3UR Editor of The Daily DX, The Weekly DX and How's DX. http://www.dailydx.com

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K0HB
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 15:40
To: Bill Turner; mike l dormann
Cc: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest



So once you have secured your zero-point mult, you refuse to give one
to anyone else?

The zero-pointers don't bother me a bit (it's a lot faster to send "5NN
4"
than to argue), but last weekend at "The Farm" (W0AIH) I was amazed (and
amused) at how many zero-pointers came back later for a dupe!
73, de Hans, K0HB
,


--------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ ---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>