CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Feb 04 QST op-ed article
From: "Hanlon, Steve" <SHanlon@dnr.state.md.us>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:59:43 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
having not passed my CW requirement i can only listen to the HF bands.  and 
listen i do.  during this past contest, i heard the usually congestion in the 
mid-ranges of the bands, but higher up, things were quite relaxed, esp on 20 
meters.  i heard contesters 500k away from each other, but they clearly were 
not bothered by it, maybe they couldn't hear each other.  i heard rag-chewers 
talking about the QRM from the contesters but they were civil and thanked the 
manufacturers of their rigs for the fine filters and DSP's.  

i moved to 40 and heard many of the same things - 500k away, ragchewers having 
funny conversations, and the occasional (gasp) net.  when i went to 75, 
everything changed.  a battle had ensued to hear some of the comments.  it was 
"us" against "them."  imagine what it sounds like to a new ham who is working 
on learning CW and wants to be an active ham on HF.  from listening, 75/80 is a 
place to be avoided at all costs.  mean spirited individuals is a compliment 
for some of these folks.  i'm amazed some of these ops have tickets.


considerate operator and future HF contester
-steve hanlon
KB3KAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>