CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] one call sign

To: Timo Klimoff <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] one call sign
From: i4jmy <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com>
Reply-to: i4jmy <i4jmy.mauri@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:38:21 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:21:31 +0200, Timo Klimoff
<timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net> wrote:

> Current rules allow to work other bands (by sending other bands  as a check
> log) during the single band entry but they don't allow to use same call in
> the several single band categories (except as we have learned now by asking
> permission from committee).
> 
> (both of these are 100% because I have seen CQWW contest committee writing
> about these points of rules)
> 
> Just to make this clearer ...

Do qsos made on different bands give direct and indirect helps when
the used call is the same?

If the answer is Yes, then the permission to work other bands is only
a virtual permission and basic rule is anyway broken.
If the answer is no, then the prohibition of multiple single ops
doesn't appear to have a great logic if operators do not help each
other directly.

Rules are best, and easyier to be understood when simple like a "yes"
or a "no", quite complex when some "if" is included.
Rules are uncertain when behaviour is left to own discrection because
in such case the rule becomes finally subjective.

To decide if qsos on other bands help or do not help the sb effort is
left to person's mind rather than the external world, and we won't
find ever any solution.
At least, a rule which says multiple sb is not allowed is no way
subjective, but it seems we have also to front exceptions.

What a difficult world!

73,
Mauri I4JMY
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>