CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] AA log submission

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] AA log submission
From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 00:48:21 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
JF1SQC added:

> > >Though JARL recommend their own format to submit your AA logs,
> > >of course they ALSO ACCEPT CABRILLO and any types of format.
> >
> > Not sure how to do the latter - as UA9CDC pointed out, there is
> > no JARL anything in Cabrillo specification.
><snip bit on CONTEST: field>
>
>Well, there are no definitions...
>It is right to say JARL may accept Cabrillo LIKE logs.

Yes, that is a better way to put it.  The word "Cabrillo" clearly implies
the Cabrillo standard.

>I confirmed JARL the ROBOT checks the following fields
>when your Cabrillo LIKE log is received:
>  START-OF-LOG:  2.0
>  CALLSIGN:
>  CATEGORY:
>  CLAIMED-SCORE:
>  ADDRESS:
>  NAME:
>  QSO:
>  END-OF-LOG:
>If your log contains all of said fields suitably,
>it will be accepted automatically.

There is one other thing - QSO template.  If JARL were to indicate
which _existing_ Cabrillo QSO template it would prefer to be used,
then what you describe above is a very practical way for a contest
sponsor to use Cabrillo, even if the Cabrillo specification has
_nothing_ in it for that contest.

>"CONTEST: contest-name" field is not necessary,
>but it is preferable to write such as
>  CONTEST: AA-CW
>  CONTEST: ALL-ASIA-CW

It is _not_ preferable, as there is _nothing_ in the specification for
the CONTEST: field for All-Asia contest.

This is where Cabrillo goes wrong - nobody, absolutely _nobody_
can say what Cabrillo is other than N5KO.  Little, although well-
meaning deviations from the specification such as the above are
not helping.

Perhaps JARL could try to get All-Asia into the Cabrillo spec.
It would be interesting to see if they could do it - but if not, then
work _with_ the existing spec - use only things as they are defined.

Leaving out what is a mandatory field like CONTEST: goes against
the specification, but IMHO this is better than really twisting things
by making up stuff up like a contest name or some of the things
other contest sponsors do.

Thanks for your QSP from JARL, Sei.

73, VR2BrettGraham

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>