(( the / AG )) could be required but the (( QRP )) is a bunch of
#@%$#$^^$ waste of time for everyone.
Quack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
To: "Derrick Belbas" <ve4vv@shaw.ca>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 01:06
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns
> You didn't specify CW or SSB?
>
> On fone, how about something like KB9XYZ/AG portable KG4.
>
> On CW, KF6JXP/AE/WP4...or KF6PFQ/QRP/VY1....
>
> That's about as obnoxious as I can conjure.
>
> Next.....
>
> K9GX
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Derrick Belbas" <ve4vv@shaw.ca>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 6:45 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns
>
>
> > VE7VEDAY was recently active, and still might be, for all I know.
> >
> > When Kelly and I did the Minnesota QSO party, we briefly considered
using
> > W0/J79VV/m/(3 letter county name), but we elected to not do that after I
> > was
> > advised by ARRL that I should properly use a VE#xxx/W0 call, which was
> > arduous enough.
> >
> > There was a recent change to the call sign rules up here allowing
lengthy
> > suffixes, so expect to hear more of those. But they won't allow 2x1's
for
> > daily use. Go figure. Apparently it's a "prestige" issue.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > derrick
> > VE4VV
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.23/99 - Release Date: 9/12/2005
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|