CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers - flaw in the analysis?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers - flaw in the analysis?
From: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:43:36 +0200
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 
...
>Rick, et al:
>
>I don't believe that you should figure out how many hours were 
>wasted by using the methodology you described; specifically, 
>by finding your average rate per hour and dividing total zero 
>pointers by that rate.
>
...
>Equally, if the rate was very slow when the zero pointers 
>called, then you likely didn't "lose" any time at all...you 
>just were able to "keep the frequency" or able to "prevent the 
>op from getting bored and/or not paying close attention."
>
>You have the logs....check it out, if you are so inclined.  It 
>may give you some peace of mind.
...
>Well, best of luck in the next (not that you need luck).
>
>de Doug KR2Q


This view is happily agreed in Northern Europe, under the Aurora.


73,
Jukka OH6LI @ OH0V
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>