CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions
From: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:29:04 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
WOW I'm impressed I've been awarded the silliest comment of the year award and 
been called ""amazingly
fallacious.""
It has been pointed out during this thread it would be nice before you guys 
make comments try reading first. 2 of the biggest spotters were KT3Y & K1TTT, 
hardly casual contesters. Those are both big contesters and know the rules.
Now who are all these casual contesters everyone keeps referring to? The 
contest which is currently being discussed Stew Perry, a 160 meter contest. 160 
meters is a 'man's' band. It is not a band for rejects from CB or guys who can 
only pass a test by memorizing the answers in a Q&A pool. Casual operators 
don't sit for hour after hours spotting 160 meters. Casual operators don't 
usually have 160 meter antennas mainly because of the size of a 160 meter 
aerial. Compromise aerials don't usually work very well on 160 either for 
receiving or transmitting.
Why so much defending of casual operators, who don't really exist? Why so much 
defending the principle I can do whatever I want whenever I want? This thread 
started out with questions about cheating during contests.
Hmmmmm
"Me thinks thou(you) protest/defend to much"

My final comment this time on this subject.
Merry Christmas
73

 
MAL              N7MAL
BULLHEAD CITY, AZ
http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm
http://geocities.com/n7mal/
Don't worry about the world coming to an end today.
It's already tomorrow in Australia
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Naumann - W5OV 
  To: cq-contest@contesting.com 
  Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2005 22:48
  Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions



  "It doesn't say it's OK to spot if you are not actually in the contest."

  This has to be the silliest comment posted on CQ-Contest for the year 2005.

  How do contest rules apply in any way to someone who is *"not actually in
  the contest"* ?

  I hope that common sense and logic will begin to prevail in 2006.

  MX & HNY to all!

  Bob W5OV

  _______________________________________________
  CQ-Contest mailing list
  CQ-Contest@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>