*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2006.01.21. at 18:25 Paul O'Kane wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
>To: "Felber Gyula" <mttosz@enternet.hu>
>
>> Rules state that only Cabrillo logs are excepted...
>> But HADX is NOT specified in Cabrillo standard
>> http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/spec.html
>
>
>I understand Igor's concern. However, that website already
>specifies enough "official" Cabrillo templates to accommodate
>almost any contest, and HADX is no exception.
>
>My software supports nearly 80 contests, and Cabrillo has
>been its only log option for years. No one has ever been
>disqualified solely on the basis of submitting a log this
>way.
>
>> The rules also state: "No logged duplicate QSO will
>> result penalty if no points are claimed for them."
>
>The rule is clearly obsolete - it should be deleted. With
>Cabrillo, the concept of "unmarked dupes" has gone - to
>everyone's benefit.
>
>73,
>Paul EI5DI
Hi,
In addition to the above written:
Hungarian districts have not been mandatory prefix base for years now. As I
wrote on this list that on Dec 6, 2005
my call-sign has officially been modified from HA2MN/5 to HA2MN.
Effective: 12:00 UT Dec 6, 2004
My offical QTH is BUDAPEST (BP)!
You can meet more and more HA stations in the future working from other
districts than old prefix system indicates.
Please take the above into consideration both in bands and software
developing.
Thank you!
73, dx de Tibi, HA2MN CTC # 761 GACW # 802 CDX
Member of SPAR Rag Chewer's Club No. 75 in CW and Phone.
http://www.spar-hams.org
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|