[CQ-Contest] RA6YP CQ 160 CW entry

["Alex Kwan" <ceon1doi6@hotmail.com>]

Apparently, an entry of 1000 "completely fake" QSOs was submitted for 2005.

With nearly 500 "completely fake" QSOs making it into the final published 
score.

A subsequent post from K4JRB seemed to suggest this could not have happened.

So, which is it?  Dave's post seems to suggest it might be one of the few 
and inevitable fell-through-the-cracks hiccups.  Half the the QSOs getting 
binned - let alone the difference in submitted versus final score would, to 
the log-checking layman, seem like a bit of an indication of something 
potentially amiss - but sometimes things happen.

We are still left with the claim that 500 supposedly totally bogus QSOs got 
through WT4I.

Two questions:

1. UA6LV: All QSOs in the log were truly "completely fake", right?

2. Anyone: What other contests use WT4I?

_________________________________________________________________
Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest