I have not heard of any contest robot that *does not* work as N6TR
describes.
Until one exists that behaves otherwise, I think it is safe to assume that
they all work like this.
This model has become the de facto "standard". It makes sense. It's a good
thing.
73,
Bob W5OV
-----Original Message-----
From: Radiosporting Fan [mailto:radiosporting@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:59 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Working dupes
--- Tree <tree@kkn.net> wrote:
> If the QSO shows up in both logs at some point - there can't be any
> NIL deductions. Essentially what the software has to do is count the
> first "QSO" as the dupe.
>From what I understand (which may be wrong), this
applies only to the "robot" that Tree knows about.
There is nothing keeping anyone else from writing their own that treats it
differently.
There is a Cabrillo spec. There is no Cabrillo Robot Spec, fwiw. It is
best to ask for each event for which you participate.
Ev, W2EV
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|