CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Not QSLing Sprint QSOs - Is this OK?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Not QSLing Sprint QSOs - Is this OK?
From: Steve London <n2ic@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:40:41 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not QSLing a completed Sprint QSO is definitely not okay !

However, don't necessarily expect something like "TU" or "QSL".  It 
might be something as simple as "R", "E E", or (my favorite) "T".

Hope to see everyone on 3 bands this weekend !

73,
Steve, N2IC


K4RO Kirk Pickering wrote:
> I've noticed some Sprint operators repeatedly do not 
> QSL a completed Sprint QSO. Some of those operating 
> in this fashion are in the top ten, and my guess is 
> that they are off making a QSO on the second radio 
> after they got my number OK. Is this considered proper
> technique among the top tier two radio Sprint operators?
> 
> I'm still trying to crack the two radio gate open here
> in the CW Sprint.  I've read Tree's and Fisher's posts, 
> and N3BB has helped me understand what's going on as well. 
> I want to know if not QSLing is considered acceptable.
> I know some have argued "just take 'em out of the log if 
> they don't QSL."  But who wants to kill their own score, 
> after making an otherwise solid  QSO?  I'd like to know 
> the top competitors opinions on CW Sprint QSO QSLing.
> 
> 73
> 
> -Kirk  K4RO
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>