CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Crosschecking, Penalties, Accuracy, Log Massage

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Crosschecking, Penalties, Accuracy, Log Massage
From: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:43:18 EST
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In a message dated 3/6/2006 10:58:07 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
ct1boh@gmail.com writes:
>>It is interesting to see that the good efforts by contest adjudicators
to penalize inaccuracy and the ever increasing score reduction
penalties may be backfiring with increased tampering of logs by the
entrants made possible by the widespread availability of post
contesting log checking tools.<<

Been hit by it "not in log" while I know I worked the station. 

Time to remove the 3 QSO "PENALTIES"
They are illogical, have no parallel in real life tests and causing of 
scratching unsure QSOs and penalizing the other station by creating not in log 
entry.
The argument of "teaching us the lesson" of logging carefully is just plain 
silly.
Bad QSO is just bad QSO and should be removed, not counted, period.
Time to mature!!!

Oh, and add ONE point for domestic - own country QSOs in CQ WW. Another 
overdue and timely change for better!


Yuri, K3BU, N8T, N2EE, K8V
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>